Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Üriner İnkontinans Yönetimi Bilgi ve Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesinde Simülasyon ve Web Tabanlı Eğitim Yöntemlerinin Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi
PDF
Atıf
Paylaş
Talep
P: 163-169
Nisan 2020

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Üriner İnkontinans Yönetimi Bilgi ve Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesinde Simülasyon ve Web Tabanlı Eğitim Yöntemlerinin Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Bezmialem Science 2020;8(2):163-169
Bilgi mevcut değil.
Bilgi mevcut değil
Alındığı Tarih: 27.04.2019
Kabul Tarihi: 28.08.2019
Yayın Tarihi: 24.04.2020
PDF
Atıf
Paylaş
Talep

ÖZET

Amaç:

Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin üriner inkontinans (Üİ) yönetimi bilgi ve becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde simülasyon ve web tabanlı eğitim yöntemlerinin etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Yöntemler:

Tek kör, randomize kontrollü olarak yapılan bu çalışma, ikinci sınıftaki toplam 75 hemşirelik öğrencisi ile üç aşamada gerçekleştirilmiştir. Birinci aşamada; öğrencilerin tamamına Üİ yönetimiyle ilgili teorik bilgi verilip ön test uygulanmıştır. Daha sonra öğrenciler blok randomizasyon yöntemiyle; müdahale1, müdahale 2 ve kontrol grubu olmak üzere 25’er kişiden oluşan üç gruba ayrılmıştır. İkinci aşamada; müdahale 1 grubu simülasyon eğitim yöntemiyle, müdahale 2 grubu web tabanlı eğitim yöntemiyle eğitilmiş, kontrol grubuna ise herhangi bir müdahalede bulunulmamıştır. Üçüncü aşamada eğitimlerden üç ay sonra grupla rarasında bilgi ve becerilerin uzun vadede etkinliğini belirlemek amacıyla öğrencilerin tamamının becerileri Üİ’si olan gerçek hasta üzerinde değerlendirilmiş ve öğrencilere son test uygulanmıştır.

Bulgular:

Müdahale 1 ve müdahale 2 gruplarındaki bilgi düzeyi değişiminin benzer düzeyde olduğu (p=0,086) ancak her iki gruptaki bilgi düzeyinin kontrol grubuna göre daha da arttığı belirlenmiştir (p<0,001). Ayrıca beceri düzeyinin müdahale 1 grubunda en yüksek, kontrol grubunda en düşük olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0,05).

Sonuç:

Simülasyon ve web tabanlı eğitimin öğrencilerin bilgi düzeyi üzerinde olumlu ve benzer etkisi görülse de; beceri düzeyinde simülasyon eğitimi web tabanlı eğitime göre daha etkilidir.

References

1
Cooper S, Endacott, R, Cant R. Measuring nontechnical skills in medical emergency care: A review of assessment measures. Emergency Medicine 2010;2:7-16.
2
Gillespie BM, Polit DF, Hamlin L, Chaboyer W. Developing a model of competence in the OR: Psycometric validation of perceived perioperative competence scale-revised. International Journal Nursing Studies 2012;49:90-101.
3
Robinson-Smith G, Bradley PK, Meakim C.Evaluating the use of standardized patients in undergraduate psychiatric nursing experiences November. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2009;5(6):e203–e211. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.07.001.
4
Robertson B, Kaplan B, Atallah H, Higgins M, Lewitt MJ, Ander DS. The use of simulation and a modified team STEPPS curriculum for medical and Nursing student team training. The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 2010;5:332-7.
5
Crowe S, Ewar L, Derman S. Theimpact of simulation based education on nursing confidence, knowledge and patient outcomes on general medicine units. Nurse Education in Practice 2018;29:70-5.
6
Houghton CE, Casey D, Shaw D, Murphy K. Students’ experiences of implementing clinical skills in the real word of practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2013;22:1961-9.
7
McNett S. Teaching nursing psychomotor skills in a fundamentals laboratory: A literature review. Nurse Education Perspectives 2012;33:328-33.
8
Ross JG. Simulation and psychomotor skill acquisition: A review of the literature. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2012;8:e429-e435.
9
Hoffmann R, O’Donnell J, Kim Y. The effects of human patient simulators on basic knowledge in critical care nursing with undergraduate senior baccalaureate nursing students. Simulation in Healthcare 2007;2:110-4.
10
Brannan J, White A, Bezanson J. Simulator effects on cognitive skills and confidence levels Journal of Nursing Education 2008;47:495-500.
11
Hadjiconstantinou M, Byrne J, Bodicoat D H, Robertson N, Eborall H, Khunti K, Davies M. J. Do web-based interventions improve well-being in type 2 diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18:270.
12
Elgaphar SMA, El Gafar SIA. Effect of tele-nursing (phone-basedfollow-ups) on self efficacy healthy lifestyle and glycemic control in diabetic patients IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR-JNHS) 2017;6:67-76.
13
Bloomfield J, Roberts J, While A. The effects of computer assisted learning versus conventional methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47:287-94.
14
Milsom I, Gyhagen M. The prevalence of urinary incontinence, Climacteric 2018;1-6. DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263
15
Wagner T, Moore K, Subak L, De Wachter S, Dudding T. Economics of urinary and faecal incontinence, and prolapse. In:Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, eds. Incontinence. 6th ed. Paris: Health Publications Ltd; 2016:17–24
16
Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 2011;108:1132-8.
17
Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwright R, et al. Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal (AI) incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, eds. Incontinence. 6th ed. Paris: Health Publications Ltd; 2016:17–24
18
Maral I, Özkardeş H, Peskircioğlu L,Bumin MA. Prevalence of stres urinary incontinence in both sexes at or after age 15 years: a cross-sectional study. J Urol 2001;165:408-12
19
Özerdoğan N, Beji NK, Yalçın O. Urinary incontinence: its prevalance, risk factors and effects on the quality of life of women living in a region of Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004;58:145-50
20
Rutherford-Hemming T, Kelsey NC, Grenig DL, Feliciano M, Simko L, Henrich CM. Multisite single-blinded randomized control study of transfer and retention of knowledge and skill between nurses using simulation and online self-study module. Simulation in Healthcare 2016;11:264-70.
21
Aura SM, Paakkonen HJ, Metsavainio K, Saano SSM, Selander TA, Jordan SE, TurunenHE. Simulation- and web-based learning of intravenous pharmacotherapy: A 2-group comparison with 6 months’ follow-up. Journal of Radiology Nursing 2017;36:117-24.
22
Fakari FR, Kordi M, Mazloom SR, Khadivzadeh T, Tara M, Akhlaghi F. Comparing the effect of traditional, web based and simulation training on midwifery students’ clinical competence in postpartum hemorrhage management. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2015;25:65-77.
23
Kordi M, Fakari FR, Mazloom SR, Khadivzadeh T, Akhlaghi F, Tara M. Comparison of the effect of web-based, simulation-based, and conventional training on the accuracy of visual estimation of postpartum hemorrhage volume on midwifery students: A randomized clinical trial. J EducHealthPromot 2016;5:22.
24
Harrington KL, Palley JE, Pfeiffer CE. Impact of thesite specialty of a continuity practice on students’ clinical skills: Performance with standardized patients. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2010;22:191-5.
25
Kim JK. Standardized patient identification and specimen labeling: A retrospective analysis on improving patient safety. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2012;68:53-6.
26
Lucktar-Flude M, Wilson B, Larocque M. Evaluating high fidelity human simulators and standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course. Nurse Education Today 2012;32:448-52.
27
Jeffries PR. Simulation in nursing education: From Conceptualization to Evaluation. New York, NY: National League for Nursing. 2007.
28
Jeffries PR. A framework for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating. Nursing Education, Perspectives 2005;26:96-103.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House