Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Klinik Uygulamalarda Sağlık Teknolojilerine Yönelik Tutumlarının ve Bireysel Yenilikçi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel ve Korelasyonel Bir Çalışma
PDF

Özgün Araştırma

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Klinik Uygulamalarda Sağlık Teknolojilerine Yönelik Tutumlarının ve Bireysel Yenilikçi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel ve Korelasyonel Bir Çalışma

Bezmialem Science 2025;13(3):259-267 DOI: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2025.03764
, , ,
PDF
İzin

Öz

Amaç

Geleceğin hemşirelerinin sağlık teknolojilerini etkin bir şekilde kullanabilmeleri, bu teknolojilere yönelik yeterli bilgi, olumlu tutum, bireysel yenilikçilik ve öz yeterlilik davranışlarını gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada hemşirelik öğrencilerinin sağlık teknolojilerine yönelik tutumları ve bireysel yenilikçilik davranışları incelenmiştir.

Yöntemler

Kesitsel ve korelasyonel bir çalışmadır. Bir üniversitenin hemşirelik bölümünde uygulama deneyimi olan 346 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Tanımlama formu, Sağlık Personeli Sağlık Teknolojisi Değerlendirme Tutum Ölçeği ve Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği (BYÖ) kullanıldı. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve korelasyon testi kullanıldı.

Bulgular

Sağlık Personeli Sağlık Teknolojileri Değerlendirme Tutum Ölçeği toplam puan ortalaması 99,58±10,65, BYÖ toplam puan ortalaması 63,65±9,40’tır. Öğrencilerin sağlık teknolojilerini değerlendirme tutumları ile bireysel yenilikçilik davranışları arasında pozitif yönde zayıf bir korelasyon bulunmuştur.

Sonuç

Teknolojik araçların öğretilmesi, kullanımının önündeki engellerin kaldırılması ve yenilikçi davranışların geliştirilmesi için geleceğin hemşirelerinin eğitiminde sağlık teknolojisine yer verilmelidir. Olumlu tutumlar yenilikçi davranışları beraberinde getirecek ve sağlık teknolojilerindeki gelişmelerin daha hızlı benimsenmesini sağlayacaktır. Bu noktada öğrencilerin var olan olumlu tutumlarının desteklenmesi ve yenilikçi davranışlarının teşvik edilmesi zorunludur.

Anahtar Kelimeler: İnovasyon, hemşirelik, hemşirelik öğrencileri, sağlık teknolojisi, teknoloji

Kaynakça

1

Conte G, Arrigoni C, Magon A, Stievano A, Caruso R. Embracing digital and technological solutions in nursing: a scoping review and conceptual framework. Int J Med Inform. 2023:105148.

2

Ruiz-Morilla MD, Sans M, Casasa A, Giménez N. Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:1-9.

3

Yuan F, Woodman RW. Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad Manage J. 2010;53:323-42.

4

Alkhaqani A. Innovative strategies in nursing practice: new perspectives. Nurs Commun. 2022;6:e2022008.

5

Asurakkody TA, Shin SY. Innovative behavior in nursing context: a concept analysis. Asian Nurs Res. 2018;12:237-44.

6

Kuşcu FN, Yılmaz FÖ, Karatepe HK. Health personnel health technologies assessment attitude scale (HPHTAAS): a methodological study. JAVStudies. 2022;8:56-65.

7

Lee JJ, Clarke CL. Nursing students’ attitudes towards information and communication technology: an exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71:1181-93.

8

World Health Organization. Health technologies: report by the secretariat. World Health Organization, 2007. Available from: https:// i ris.who.int/bit s t ream/handle/10665/22609/A60_R29 en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

9

Locsin RC, Purnell M. Advancing the theory of technological competency as caring in nursing: the universal technological domain. Int J Hum Caring. 2015;19:50-4.

10

Terkes N, Celik F, Bektas H. Determination of nursing students’ attitudes towards the use of technology. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019;16:17-24.

11

van Houwelingen CT, Moerman AH, Ettema RG, Kort HS, Ten Cate O. Competencies required for nursing telehealth activities: a Delphi-study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:50-62.

12

Archibald MM, Barnard A. Futurism in nursing: technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:2473-80.

13

Kim S-J, Park M. Leadership, knowledge sharing, and creativity: the key factors in nurses’ innovative behavior. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45:615-21.

14

Yıldırım F, Abukan B, Öztürk H, Eker H. Use of technology in social work and digital capabilities of social workers: an evaluation in the focus of the Covid-19 pandemic. Turkish Studies. 2020:1308-2140.

15

Turan N, Kaya H, Durgun H, Asti T. Nursing students’ technological equipment usage and individual innovation levels. Comput Inform Nurs. 2019;37:298-305.

16

Kara D. Innovation in nursing practices. Glob J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7:170-4.

17

Lin C-L, Wang Y-N, Tsai H-M. Innovative thinking in nursing practice. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2013;60:97.

18

Gündoğdu H, Erol F, Tanrıkulu F, Filiz NY, Kuzgun H, Dikmen Y. Determination of attitudes of nursing students towards information and communication technologies. Int J Hum Sci. 2018;15:441-50.

19

Korkmaz A, Korkmaz AÇ. Nurse candidates’ attitudes towards computer use in nursing. YASAD. 2018;8:1-18.

20

Özen N, Yazıcıoğlu İ, Çınar Fİ. Analyzing the correlation between the attitudes of nursing students towards using computers in health care and clinical decision making skills. J Educ Res Nurs. 2017;14:112-8.

21

Şahin E, Yavan T, Demirhan M, Aydın M, Yeşilçınar İ. Determination of attitudes of nursing students towards information and communication technologies. BSJ Pub Soc Sci. 2020;12:193-202.

22

Atasoy I, Özdemir SÇ, Evli M. Relationship between individual innovativeness and 21 st -century skills of nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;126:105830.

23

Başoğlu M, Edeer AD. Comparison of generation X and Y nurses and student nurses’ individual innovativeness awareness. Gümüşhane Univ J Health Sci. 2017;6:77-84.

24

Bodur G. The relationship between individual innovativeness and entrepreneurship tendency of nursing students. J Health Sci Prof. 2018;5:139-48.

25

Shen Y, Xie W, Wang X, Qu J, Zhou T, Li Y, et al. Impact of innovative education on the professionalism of undergraduate nursing students in China. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104647.

26

Sis-Çelik A, Bayrakçeken E, Kılınç T. Individual innovation characteristics according to nurses’ gender roles and affecting factors. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci. 2020;23:397-409.

27

Tarhan M, Doğan P. The relationship between nursing students’ individual innovative behaviors and autonomy levels. J Health Sci Prof. 2018;5:51-8.

28

Yayla A, Sarıoğlu-Kemer A. The Effect of individual innovativeness characteristics on attitudes towards evidence-based practices in X and Y generation nurses. J Health Nurs Manag. 2020;7:271-9.

29

Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest. 2020;158:S65-71.

30

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-91.

31

Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Hum Commun Res. 1977;4:58-65.

32

Sarıoğlu Kemer A, Altuntaş S. Adaptation of the individual innovativeness scale in nursing profesion: Turkish validity - reliability study. J Educ Res Nurs. 2017;14:52-61.

33

George D, Mallery M. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update Boston. Pearson. 2010.

34

Şenyuva E. Reflections on nursing education of technological developments. Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019;27:79-90.

35

Hack-Polay D, Mahmoud AB, Ikafa I, Rahman M, Kordowicz M, Verde JM. Steering resilience in nursing practice: examining the impact of digital innovations and enhanced emotional training on nurse competencies. Technovation. 2023;120:102549.

36

Honey M, Collins E, Britnell S. Education into policy: embedding health informatics to prepare future nurses-New Zealand case study. JMIR Nursing. 2020;3:e16186.

37

Walker S, Dwyer T, Broadbent M, Moxham L, Sander T, Edwards K. Constructing a nursing identity within the clinical environment: the student nurse experience. Contemporary nurse. 2014;49:103-12.

38

HUCEP HUÇEP-NNCEP. HUCEP 2022. 2022. Council of Higher Education (YÖK). Available from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/ egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Ulusal-cekirdek-egitimi-programlari/ hemsirelik_cekirdek_egitim_programi.pdf. Accessed September 2023

39

Kaye SP. Nurses’ attitudes toward meaningful use technologies: an integrative review. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017;35:237-47.

40

Baltacı N, Metin A. The relationship between nursing students’ individual innovativeness levels and attitudes to evidence-based nursing. J Inonu Univ Health Serv Voc Sch. 2021;9:578-93.

41

Kılıçer K, Odabaşı HF. Individual innovativeness scale (IIS): the study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 2010:150-64.

42

Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation. 1995:25-38.

43

Bencsik A, Horváth-Csikós G, Juhász T. Y and Z generations at workplaces. J Compet. 2016;8:90-106.

44

Sarıoğlu Kemer A, Hendekci A, Erbil B. Are nurses innovative or ambidextrous leaders? An evaluation from the perspective of prospective nurses: a structural equation modeling-multiple group analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105574.