ÖZET
Amaç:
Tıbbi hatalar, dünyadaki tüm sağlık kuruluşlarında çok önemli bir sorundur. Hasta güvenliği kültürü oluşturmak tıbbi hataların azaltılmasında çok önemlidir. Hemşireler hasta güvenliğini sağlamada özel bir öneme sahiptir. Hemşirelik eğitimi ile hasta güvenliğini artırmaya ve tıbbi hataları azaltmaya yardımcı olabilecek bilgi, beceri ve tutumlar kazanılabilir. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliği kültürüne yönelik tutumunu ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç yoktur. Araştırmanın amacı, hemşirelik öğrencileri için hasta güvenliği tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olup olmadığını araştırmaktır.
Yöntemler:
Metodolojik olarak tasarlanan çalışma, Şubat-Nisan 2019 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma, İstanbul’da bir özel üniversitenin hemşirelik bölümünde okuyan üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri (n=226) ile etik onay ve kurum izni alınarak yürütülmüştür.
Bulgular:
Analiz sonuçlarına göre orijinal ölçeğin genel olarak faktör yapısına uymadığı görülmüştür. Ölçek, 22 madde ve 4 faktörden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin toplam varyansı %65,14’tür. Güvenilirlik analizi sonucunda ölçeğin Cronbach alfa katsayısı 0,91 olarak hesaplanmıştır.
Sonuç:
İki bin dokuz yılında Carruthers ve ark. tarafından geliştirilen ölçeğin, Türkiye’deki hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hasta güvenliğine yönelik tutumlarını ölçmek için kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu bulunmuştur.
References
1
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000. p.312.
2
World Health Organization. Multi-professional patient safety curriculum guide, 2011.
3
Healthcare Risk Control. Culture of safety. ECRI Institute; 2009 [cited 2019 september 26]. Available from: https://www.ecri.org/Documents/Patient_Safety_Center/HRC_CultureofSafety.pdf
4
Wold Health Organization.World Alliance for patient safety. Forward programme 2006-2007. Geneva: WHO Press; 2006. LİNK YOK LİNK BIRAKIYORUM. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69349/WHO_EIP_HDS_PSP_2006.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
5
Farquhar M, Sharp BAC, Clancy CM. Patient safety in nursing practice. AORN J 2007;86: 455-7.
6
Batalden P, Berwick D, Billi J. Report V. Contemporary issues in medicine: Quality of care. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2001.
7
Patey R, Rlin R, Cuthbertson BH, MacDonald L, Meams K, Cleland J, et al. Patient safety: Helping medical student understand error in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:256-9.
8
Ziv Stephen D Small Paul Root Wolpe A. Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teach 2000;22:489-95.
9
Seiden SC, Galvan C, Lamm R. Role of medical students in preventing patient harm and enhancing patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:272-6.
10
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Health Professions Education Summit. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Greiner AC, Knebel E, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003.
11
Firth-Cozens J. Cultures for improving patient safety through learning: the role of teamwork. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 2):ii26-31.
12
Henderson AJ, Forrester K, Heel A. The establishment of structures and processes for the safe and effective clinical placement of nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract 2006; 6:275-80.
13
Vaismoradi M, Salsali M, Marck P. Patient safety: nursing students’ perspectives and the role of nursing education to provide safe care. Int Nurs Rev 2011;58:434-42.
14
Steven A, Magnusson C, Smith P, Pearson PH. Patient safety in nursing education: contexts, tensions and feeling safe to learn. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:277-84.
15
Lee NJ, An JY, Song TM, Jang H, Park SY. Psychometric evaluation of a patient safety competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2014;53: 550-62.
16
Hwang JI. What are hospital nurses’ strengths and weaknesses in patient safety competence? Findings from three Korean hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2015;27:232-8.
17
Tella S, Liukka M, Jamookeeah D, Smith NJ, Partanen P, Turunen H. What do nursing students learn about patient safety? An integrative literature review. J Nurs Educ 2014;53:7-13.
18
Mansour MJ, Al Shadafan SF, Abu-Sneineh FT, AlAmer MM. Integrating patient safety education in the undergraduate nursing curriculum: a discussion paper. Open Nurs J 2018;12:125-32.
19
Attree M, Cooke H, Wakefield A. Patient safety in an English pre-registration nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8:239-48.
20
Carruthers S, Lawton R, Sandars J, Howe A, Perry M. Attitudes to patient safety amongst medical students and tutors: Developing a reliable and valid measure. Med Teach 2009;31:e370-6.
21
Tavşancıl E. Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS, 5th ed. Nobel Akademy Press, Ankara; 2014.
22
Torun N, Dinçer M, Öztaş D, Demir P, Sanisoğlu SY. Adapting the Scale for Culture of Patient Safety Attitude of Students of Medicine School to Turkish. Journal Of Contemporary Medicine 2018;8:153-8.
23
International Test Commission, The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition). 2017. (Date of Access: 26.9.19). Available from: https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
24
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539-49.
25
World Health Organization (WHO), Process of translation and adaptation of instruments, 2019. [cited 2019 september 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
26
Capik C, Gozum S, Aksayan S. Intercultural scale adaptation stages, language and culture adaptation: Updated guideline. Florence Nightingale J Nurs 2018;26:199-210.
27
Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res 1992;5:194-7.
28
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2012.
29
Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Bilimsel Research methods. 5th edition, Pegem Academy, Ankara; 2010.
30
Çam M, Arabacı L. Qualitative and Quantitative Steps on Attitude Scale Construction. Turkish J Res Dev Nurs 2010;2:65-8.
31
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Principles and Methods, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins., Philadelphia; 2012.
32
Akgül A. Statistical Analysis Techniques in Medical Research “SPSS Applications”. 3rd edition, Emek Ofset Ltd., Ankara; 2005.
33
Büyüköztürk Ş. Manual of data analysis for social sciences. 15th edition, Pegem Academy, Ankara; 2011.
34
Erefe İ. The nature of data collection tools. Research principles and methods in nursing. Erefe İ, Ed. 1st Edition. Istanbul: Focus Offset; 2002.p. 169-88.
35
Gözüm, S., Aksayan, S. Guidelines II for intercultural scale adaptation: Psychometric properties and intercultural comparison. Journal of Research and Development in Nursing 2003;5:3-14.
36
Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Scientific Software International Inc, Chicago; 2001.
37
Harrington D. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press. Newyork, USA; 2009.
38
Şimşek ÖF. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Basic Principles and LISREL Applications, 1st Edition. Ankara: Ekinoks Education Publishing; 2007. p. 14-49.
39
Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 1st Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, London; 1998. p. 3-37.
40
Öner N. Psychological Tests Used in Turkey: A Reference Guide, Expanded 2nd Edition. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publishing House; 2008.
41
Yurdugül H. Some details for scale development studies in behavioral sciences; 2005. [cited 2019 september 20]. Available from:http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~yurdugul/3/indir/FA_OrneklemGe nislilik.pdf
