ÖZET
Amaç:
Bu çalışma, Fetal Sağlık Kaygı Envanteri (FSKE) Türkçe’ye uyarlamayı ve ölçeğin gebelerde geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Yöntemler:
Örnek 1’de yer alan 370 gebeye açıklayıcı faktör analizi (AFA), Örnek 2’de yer alan 200 gebeye doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) uygulanmıştır. FSKE’nin ölçüt-bağıntılı geçerlik testi için Prenatal Distres Ölçeği (PDÖ) kullanıldı. Envanterin güvenirliği Cronbach’s alfa güvenirlik katsayısı, madde-toplam puan korelasyon katsayısı ve test-retest analizi ile incelendi.
Bulgular:
Örnek 1’e uygulanan AFA sonucunda 14 maddelik FSKE’nin tek faktörü kapsadığı ve Örnek 2’ye uygulanan DFA sonucunda ölçeğin iyi uyum indeksleri (χ2/standart sapma =3,148, karşılaştırmalı uyum indeksi =0,907, artıkların standart sapması veya kök ortalama kare hatası =0,000, kök ortalama karekök hatası =0,089 ve p değeri =0,000) gösterdiği belirlendi. FSKE ile PDÖ arasında istatistiksel olarak pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişki olduğu saptandı (r=0,851, p<0,01). Envanterin Cronbach’s alfa iç tutarlık katsayısının 0,85 olduğu ve madde-toplam korelasyon katsayılarının r=0,34-0,59 arasında değiştiği bulundu (p<0,001). Test-tekrar test analizinde, iki farklı uygulamada elde edilen envanterin toplam puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişki bulundu (r=0,568, p=0,001).
Sonuç:
Bu çalışma, 14 maddeden oluşan FSKE’nin Türk gebe kadınlarda fetal sağlık kaygısını ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olarak kullanımını desteklemiştir.
References
1
Topaç Tunçel N, Kahyaoğlu Süt H. The Effect of Anxiety, Depression and Prenatal Distress Levels in Pregnancy on Prenatal Attachment. The Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology 2019;16:9-17.
2
Öztürk N, Aydın N. The Importance Of Maternal Mental Health. Marmara University Journal of Women and Gender Studies 2017;2:29-36.
3
Özdamar Ö, Yılmaz O, Beyca HH, Muhcu M. Common Psychiatric Disorders in Pregnancy and Postpartum Period. Zeynep Kamil Medical Journal 2014;45:71-7.
4
Harpel TS. Fear of The Unknown: Ultrasound and Anxiety About Fetal Health. Health (London) 2008;12:295-312.
5
Yonkers KA, Gilstad-Hayden K, Forray A, Lipkind HS. Association of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and benzodiazepine treatment during pregnancy with risk of adverse birth outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry 2017;74:1145-52.
6
Kikkert HK, Middelburg KJ, Hadders-Algra M. Maternal anxiety is related to infant neurological condition, paternal anxiety is not. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:171-7.
7
Dole N, Savitz DA, Hertz-Picciotto I, Siega-Riz AM, McMahon MJ, Buekens P. Maternal stress and preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:14-24.
8
Huizink AC, Robles de Medina PG, Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Buitelaar JK. Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003;44:810-8.
9
Kowalyk KM, Hadjistavropoulos HD, Jones SL. What impact does pregnancy have on anxiety about health? J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009;30:223-30.
10
Yılmaz T, Dinç H, Demirgöz Bal M. Practices Carried out by Pregnant Women to Improve Fetal Health. JAREN 2015;1:21-9.
11
Ekelin M, Crang Svalenius E, Larsson AK, Nyberg P, Maršál K, Dykes AK. Parental expectations, experiences and reactions, sense of coherence and grade of anxiety related to routine ultrasound examination with normal findings during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:952-9.
12
Akca E, Gökyıldız Sürücü Ş, Sanberk I. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PEER-U scale. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2019;37:1-14.
13
Van der Bergh BRH. The influence of maternal emotions during pregnancy on fetal and neonatal behavior. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology and Health 1990;5:119-30.
14
Huizink AC, Delforterie MJ, Scheinin NM, Tolvanen M, Karlsson L, Karlsson H. Adaption of pregnancy anxiety questionnaire–revised for all pregnant women regardless of parity: PRAQ-R2. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:125-32.
15
Kırca Şolt A, Kanza Gül D. Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (The PrAS): Validity and Reliability Study of its Turkish Version. Celal Bayar University-Health Sciences Institute Journal 2020;7:529-37.
16
Comrey AL, Lee HB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. New York; 1992;2nd edition:217.
17
https://www.openepi.com/Power/PowerCross.htm
18
Yali MA, Lobel M. Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1999;20:39-52.
19
Lobel M. The Stony Brook pregnancy project: Revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (NUPDQ) Scoring information, 2008.
20
Yuksel F, Akin S, Durna Z. Prenatal distress in Turkish pregnant women and factors associated with maternal prenatal distress. J Clin. Nurse 2012;23:54-64.
21
Reiser SJ, Wright KD. Fetal health anxiety: development and psychometric properties of the fetal health anxiety inventory. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2019;40:264-73.
22
Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Guidelines for Cross-Cultural Scale Adaptation II: Psychometric Properties and Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Research and Development in Nursing 2003;1:3-14.
23
Aker S, Dündar C, Pekşen Y. Two Vital Concepts in Measurement Tools: Validity and Reliability. 19 May University Medical Journal 2005;22:50-60.
24
Ozturk H, Babacan E. A study in scale development: the occupational safety scale (oss) for health care personnel working in hospital. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2012;9:36-42.
25
Yurdugül H. Using scope validity indices for scope validity in scale development studies XIV. National Educational Sciences Congress. 2005;1-6.
26
Lim S, Jahng S. Determining the number of factors using parallel analysis and its recent variants. Psychol Methods 2019;24:452-67.
27
Samuels P. Advice on exploratory factor analysis. 2017; URL: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6076.
28
Tavşancıl E. Measuring Attitudes and Data Analysis with SPSS. 4. Baskı. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım; 2010 (in Turkish).
29
Mohajan HK. Two crıterıa for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series 2017;17:59-82.
30
Zeybek SU, Çeçen Eroğul AR. An Examination of Psychometric Properties of Positive Functional Attitudes Scale. JCBPR 2017;6:59-66.
31
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999;6:1-55.
32
Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education 2018;48:1273-96.
33
Piedmont RL. Inter-item correlations. In Michalos AC (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer 2014;3303-4.
34
Alpar R. Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and educational sciences. Detay Publishing; 2018, 5th Edition:672.
35
Ercan I, Kan I. Reliability and validity in scales. Uludag Universiy Journal of College of Medicine 2004;30:211-6.
36
Cokluk O, Şekercioğlu G, Buyukozturk Ş. Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications. 3rd ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık: 2014;275-332 (in Turkish).
37
Frasch MG, Lobmaier SM, Stampalija T, Desplats P, Pallarés ME, Pastor V, et al. Non-invasive biomarkers of fetal brain development reflecting prenatal stress: An integrative multi-scale multi-species perspective on data collection and analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018;117:16-83.
38
Capık C. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2014;17:196-205.
39
Alpar R. Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2010. (in Turkish).
40
Dolgun G, İnal S, Erdim L, Korkut S. Reliability and validity of the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool in the Turkish population. Midwifery 2018;57:47-53.
41
Laursen M, Johansen C, Hedegaard M. Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG 2009;116:1350-5.
42
Madhavanprabhakaran GK, Kumar KA, Ramasubramaniam S. Effects of pregnancy related anxiety on labour outcomes: a prospective cohort study. J Res Nurs Midwifery 2013;2:96-103.
43
Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women’s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section -a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:807-13.
