ÖZET
Amaç:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, cam iyonomer siman bazlı restoratif materyallerin su emilimi ve çözünürlüğü özelliklerini araştırmaktır.
Yöntemler:
Teflon halkalar (10x2 mm) kullanılarak her bir materyal (Riva Self Cure, Riva Light Cure, GCP Glass Fill) için toplam 21 örnek hazırlandı. Örnekler desikatör içerisine yerleştirilerek 24 saat 37±1 ºC’de bekletildi ve bu süre sonunda her örneğin ağırlığı hassas terazi ile ölçüldü. Aynı örnekler daha sonra üç gruba ayrılarak bir gün boyunca distile su, alkollü gargara ve alkolsüz gargara içeren solüsyonlarda 37±1 ºC’de saklandı. Örnekler sabit bir kütleye gelinceye kadar tekrar desikatörde kurutuldu. Her örneğin çap ve kalınlıkları dijital elektronik kumpas kullanılarak ölçüldü. Veriler one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey testleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi ve alfa hata düzeyi 0,05 olarak seçildi.
Bulgular:
Su emilim değerleri, resin modifiye cam iyonomer siman grubu için yüksek viskoziteli cam iyonomer siman (HVGIC) grubundan üç farklı ortamın hepsinde anlamlı olarak yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,05). HVGIC materyali üç ortamın tümü için benzer su emilim değerleri göstermiştir.
Sonuç:
Restoratif materyallerin içerikleri, farklı alanlarda su emilim/ çözünürlüklerinde kilit rol oynar.
References
1
Bhatia HP, Singh S, Sood S, Sharma N. A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10:49-54.
2
Terry DA, Leinfelder KF, Maragos C. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--Part I. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:313-8; quiz 320.
3
Naasan M, Watson T. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1998;11:36-45.
4
Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH-K. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int 2003;34:31-7.
5
Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301.
6
Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1994;10:78-82.
7
Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-9.
8
Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Current fluoride-releasing restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. Clin Exp Health Sci 2016;6:129-34.
9
Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken J. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater 2009;25:551-6.
10
Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852-6.
11
Hinoura K, Onose H, Masutani S, Matsuzaki T, Moore B. Volumetric change of light cured glass ionomer in water. J Dent Res 1993;72:222.
12
Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:1248-54.
13
Burt BA. Prevention policies in the light of the changed distribution of dental caries. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:179-86.
14
Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL, Paulillo LAMS, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and ethanol immersion media on the susceptibility of a microhybrid composite resin to staining. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:105-9.
15
Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui F, Ambrosano G, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Effect of different mouthrinses on Knoop hardness of a restorative composite. Am J Dent 2005;18:338-40.
16
Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26:6449-59.
17
Lopes LG, Cefaly DF, Franco EB, Mondelli RF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two” packable” posterior composite resins: two-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:123-8.
18
Witzel MF, Calheiros FC, Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR. Influence of photoactivation method on conversion, mechanical properties, degradation in ethanol and contraction stress of resin-based materials. J Dent 2005;33:773-9.
19
Küçükeşmen HC, Küçükeşmen Ç, Öztaş D, Kaplan R. Farklı Tiplerdeli Geleneksel ve Rezin-Modifiye Cam İyonomer Simanların Su Emilimi ve Suda Çözünürlüğü. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2005;32:25-34.
20
Salinovic I, Stunja M, Schauperl Z, Verzak Z, Ivanisevic Malcic A, Brzovic Rajic V. Mechanical Properties of High Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials. Acta Stomatol Croat 2019;53:125-31.
21
Bonifacio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RC, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J 2009;54:233-7.
22
Yamakami SA, Ubaldini ALM, Sato F, Medina Neto A, Pascotto RC, Baesso ML. Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin. J Appl Oral Sci 2018;26:e20170384.
23
Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Resin-based composites show similar kinetic profiles for dimensional change and recovery with solvent storage. Dent Mater 2015;31:e201-e17.
24
Archegas L, Caldas D, Rached RN, Vieira S, Souza EM. Sorption and solubility of composites cured with quartz-tungsten halogen and light emitting diode light-curing units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:73-80.
25
Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva. J Dent 2015;43:1511-8.
26
Palin W, Fleming G, Burke F, Marquis P, Randall R. The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:852-63.
27
Rahim TNAT, Mohamad D, Akil HM, Ab Rahman I. Water sorption characteristics of restorative dental composites immersed in acidic drinks. Dent Mater 2012;28:e63-e70.
28
Cattani-Lorente M-A, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer J-M. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1999;15:71-8.
29
Değer C, Kari P, Müjdeci A. Kompozir Rezinlerin Su Emilimi ve Çözünürlüğü Üzerine Gargaraların Etkisi. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2017;44:129-39.
30
Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Jacquot B, Panighi MM. Water sorption and water solubility of current luting cements: An in vitro study. Quintessence Int 2008;39:e107-14.
31
Leal JP, da Silva JD, Leal RFM, Oliveira-Júnior CdC, Prado VLG, Vale GC. Effect of Mouthwashes on Solubility and Sorption of Restorative Composites. Int J Dent 2017;2017:5865691.
32
Ozer S, Sen Tunc E, Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Solubility of two resin composites in different mouthrinses. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:580675.
33
Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer–Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:824-32.
34
Subramaniam P, Girish Babu K, Jayasurya S. Evaluation of solubility and microleakage of glass carbomer sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39:429-34.
35
Akman H, Tosun G, Kahvecioğlu F. Kütlesel olarak yerleştirilebilen restoratif materyallerin su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J 2018;5:13-21
36
Perala SR, Bhupathiraju P. Efficacy of Four Fluoride Mouth Rinses on Streptococcus mutans in High Caries Risk Children - A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC56-ZC60.
37
Armas-Vega A, Casanova-Obando P, Taboada-Alvear MF, Aldas-Ramirez JE, Montero-Oleas N, Viteri-Garcia A. Effect of mouthwashes on the integrity of composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer: In vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e179-e84.
38
Trauth KG, Godoi AP, Colucci V, Corona SA, Catirse AB. The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:209-14.
39
Jyothi K, Crasta S, Venugopal P. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness of a nanofilled resin composite restorative material: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2012;15:214-7.
40
da Silva AB, Raposo NM, Gomes IA, Goncalves LM, Paschoal MA. In vitro quantitative comparison of erosive potential of infant mouthwashes on glass ionomer cement. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e206-e11.
41
Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Romeo A, de la Higuera B, et al. Sorption and solubility testing of orthodontic bonding cements in different solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:251-6.
42
Kielbassa AM, Glockner G, Wolgin M, Glockner K. Systematic review on highly viscous glass-ionomer cement/resin coating restorations (Part I): Do they merge Minamata Convention and minimum intervention dentistry? Quintessence Int 2016;47:813-23.
