Original Article

Our Five Years of Kaposi’s Sarcoma Experience: Which Histopathological Parameters are More Valuable in Diagnosis?

10.14235/bas.galenos.2023.78300

  • Cansu BENLİ IŞIK
  • Hatice ÖLGER UZUNER

Received Date: 28.11.2022 Accepted Date: 15.03.2023 Bezmialem Science 2024;12(1):90-97

Objective:

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a vascular proliferation associated with Human Herpes Virus 8. Typical histopathological findings of KS are characterized by vascular proliferation, inflammatory cell infiltration, extravasated erythrocytes and spindle cell proliferation, although it varies according to the stage. In this study, the clinical-histopathological features of patients with KS were examined. The value of histopathological parameters in the diagnosis was investigated.

Methods:

Patients with KS diagnosed in University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Training and Research Hospital Medical Pathology Department between 2016-2020 were retrospectively scanned. Clinical and tumor features and histopathological changes in the surrounding tissue were evaluated.

Results:

The most common histopathological features belonging to tumor were extravasated erythrocytes, spindle cell changes, fascicle formation, slit-like space; the most common epidermal features were hyperkeratosis and acanthosis; the most common peritumoral features were the presence of large vessels and ectatic vessels in the periphery. There was a significant relationship between the promontory sign and the lymphangioma-like area and ulcer. Also there was a significant relationship between nuclear atypia and lymphangioma-like area.

Conclusion:

While most of the histopathological features are characteristic for KS, none of them alone is specific. They should be evaluated together with all structural, tumoral and peritumoral features during the diagnostic approach.

Keywords: Kaposi’s sarcoma, vascular tumor, histopathology, human herpes virus 8, HHV-8, promontory sign

Introduction

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a vascular proliferation associated with human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8), and is still contoversial whether it is a true sarcoma or not. It’s worldwide estimated incidence is 0.6/100,000 person-year (1). Four different clinical/epidemiological subtypes of KS have been defined: classic, epidemic [acquired immunodeficiency syndrome associated], endemic (African type), and iatrogenic (transplantation-associated) KS (1-3). All these types show similar histomorphological spectrum. The histopathological development of the tumor occurs in clinically distinguishable patch, plaque and nodule stages. In addition to the usual type of KS, there are many histopathological subtypes defined in the literature such as anaplastic, lymphedematous, lymphangioma-like, lymphangiectatic, bullous, telangiectatic, hyperkeratotic, keloidal, micronodular, pyogenic granuloma-like, ecchymotic, intravascular, and regressed KS (2,4,5).

Typical histopathological findings of KS are characterized by vascular proliferation, inflammatory cell infiltration, extravasated erythrocytes and spindle cell proliferation, although it varies according to the stage. Apart from these well-known features, what other histological changes are observed in the tumor and surrounding tissue, and which ones are more valuable in making the diagnosis?

In our study, answers to these questions were sought, and detailed histopathological analysis of patients with KS diagnosed in the Medical Pathology Department of University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Training and Research Hospital during the 5-year period covering the years 2016-2020 was carried out. Clinical and tumor features and histopathological changes in the surrounding tissue were evaluated. The value of histopathological parameters to making the diagnosis was investigated.


Methods

Case Selection

Patients with KS diagnosed in University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Medical Pathology Department between 2016-2020 were retrospectively scanned from the hospital information management system (HIMS). Fourty three patients who had excisional or punch biopsies were detected. The slides of the patients were removed from the archive. Three patients were excluded because there was no slide or block in the archive. The clinical data of the patients (age, gender, localization of the lesions) were compiled from HIMS. Histopathological evaluation was performed using hematoxylin/eosin stained slides, immunohistochemical (HHV-8 in all patients) and histochemical (PAS in some patients) materials. One patient was not found to be compatible with KS after re-evaluation and was excluded from the study.

The study was approved by the Non-invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee of University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Training and Research Hospital (decision no: 2019/3/4) and performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Histomorphological evaluation

The slides of the lesions included in the study were re-evaluated by double observers. Epidermal parameters (hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, papillomatosis, vesicle/bulla, ulcer), tumor features (vascular horizontal location, presence of miniature vessels in the center, lymphangioma-like area, hemangioma-like area, promontory sign, collagen fiber dissection, erythrocyte extravasation, hemosiderin/hemosiderin-laden macrophage, presence of spindle cell, slit-like space, fascicle formation, presence of hyaline globule, nuclear atypia, mitosis, necrosis, inflammatory infiltrate) and peritumoral features (large vessel in the periphery, ectatic vessel in the periphery) were evaluated. Mitosis was counted in 10 high power fields. Inflammatory infiltrate was graded as dense, moderate, mild, and the predominant cell component (lymphocyte, plasma, neutrophil) was determined. All other parameters were classified as present/absent.

Statistical Analysis

The SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chiago, Illinois, USA) program was applied for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were given as numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Numerical variables were given as mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum. Comparison of rates in independent groups was made with the chi-square test. Since the numeric variables showed normal distribution, comparisons of independent two groups were made with Student’s t-test. Statistical alpha significance level was accepted as p<0.05.


Results

Of the 39 patients included in the study, 28 (71.8%) were male and 11 (28.2%) were female. The mean age ± standard deviation of the patients was 71.8±8.5, and the age range was between 49 and 92 years. Tumors were located in the lower extremity in 25 (65.8%) patients, in the upper extremity in 12 (31.6%) patients, and in the scrotum in 1 (2.6%) patient. Thirty two (82.1%) of the evaluated materials were excisional materials and 7 (17.9%) of them were punch biopsy materials. The stages of the patients were detected as “patch” in only 2 patients and as “nodul” in the others.

The histopathological parameters we evaluated and their incidence rates are shown in Table 1.

The most common finding we determined from the features of the tumor was the presence of extravasated erythrocytes (n=38), and the most common finding among the epidermis parameters was hyperkeratosis (n=34).

The rate of detection of spindle cell changes, fascicles, peripheral large vessels, slit-like spaces, and ulcers was statistically significantly lower in punch biopsies than excisional biopsies (Table 2).

When the findings were compared according to localization, no significant difference was found between the findings.

When the relationship between the parameters was examined;

- The rate of ulceration in sarcomas with promontory sign was statistically significantly higher than those without promontory sign (p=0.010) (Table 3).

- Presence of lymphangioma-like area in those without nuclear atypia was statistically significantly higher than those with nuclear atypia (p=0.024) (Table 4).

- The mean mitosis of patients with spindle cell changes, fascicles, peripheral great vessels, slit-like spaces, and ulcers were statistically significantly higher than those without them (Table 5).

- No significant difference was found in the findings of patients with or without hyaline globules.

A feature that caught our attention was the presence of moderate or intense mixed type lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory cell infiltration in each patient (Table 6).

Pictures of some of the histopathological parameters are given in Figure 1.


Discussion

Kaposi's sarcoma is an HHV-8-associated vascular proliferation primarily involving the skin, most commonly located in the lower extremities (1). Most of the studies which were reported until now on KS were related to demographic and clinical data, and studies examining histopathological features were in the minority. In our study, histopathological features as well as demographic data were discussed in detail.

When the demographic data of the patients included in our study were compared with the literature, no difference was found.

The mean age of onset of KS may differ according to the subtype (6-8). However, the mean age in classical KS has been reported to be between 65 and 75 in most studies (3,4,6,9). In our study, the mean age of the patients was 71.8 (age range between 49 and 92), which was similar to the literature.

The female/male ratio was reported at different rates between studies. While the M/F ratio was 2.36 in the study of Demirel et al., (4) 2.11 in the study of Kandemir et al., (5) 4.07 in the study of Errihani et al., (10) and this ratio was 6.5 in the study of Wu et al. (11). In our study, the male/female ratio was 2.54.

Typical histopathological findings of KS vary according to the stage. Patch-stage lesions are characterized by thin endothelial cell proliferation that breaks down collagen (1,2,4). The extension of small proliferating vascular structures towards to larger vessel lumens causes the appearance called “promontory sign” (2). Early stage lesions may be accompanied by promontory sign. Plaque stage lesions are more cellular and are characterized by dense dermal vascular infiltrate and spindle cell proliferation. Other expected findings are hyaline globules, siderophages, and slit-like spaces containing erythrocytes (1,2). Nodule stage lesions are much more cellular. The spindle cells form fascicles and slit-like spaces are common. Hyaline globules and mitoses can be seen (1,2).

Almost all of our patients were in the nodule stage, and in accordance with this, the most frequent tumor-related features we detected were extravasated erythrocytes, spindle cell changes, fascicles, slit-like space and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. Among the peritumoral features, the presence of large vessels in the periphery was a remarkable feature in KS with 74% of cases.

It has been reported in the literature that promontory sign is frequently seen in early-stage lesions (1,2). Since almost all of our patients were in the nodule stage in our study, we could not compare the relationship between the stage and the promontory sign. However, we observed that the promontory sign was not less in the nodule stage. In addition, we found that there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the promontory sign and the presence of ulcer. In the approach to an ulcerated skin lesion, the presence of promontory sign should raise suspicion in terms of KS. However, it should be noted that the promontory sign is not pathognomonic for KS. It has been emphasized that it is not an uncommon feature in patch or plaque stage of angiosarcomas (12), and it has been reported that it can also be seen in reactive benign vascular proliferations (13).

It has been reported that promontory sign is observed more frequently in lymphangioma-like subtype (2,5). Consistent with this, we also observed the presence of promontory sign in 3 of our 3 patients with lymphangioma-like areas.

In our study, some histopathological features such as spindle cell change and the presence of fascicles were found to be significantly lower in punch biopsies compared to excisional biopsies. These findings, which are strongly suggestive for diagnosis, may be observed less frequently in small biopsies, which may lead to missed diagnosis or delays in diagnosis.

Nuclear atypia and high mitosis are not common findings in KS. They can be observed more frequently in advanced lesions. In our study, we found a significant relationship between nuclear atypia and the presence of lymphangioma-like areas. Presence of lymphangioma-like area in those without nuclear atypia was statistically significantly higher than those with nuclear atypia. When we searched the literature, we did not find any study reporting a relationship between atypia and lymphangiomatous area. In this sense, our study presents a new finding.

When the relationship between the number of mitosis and histopathological changes was compared; we found a significant relationship between mitosis and spindle cell change, fascicle formation, large vessels in the periphery, slit-like space and ulcer. Considering that spindle cell changes, slit-like space and fascicle formation were more common findings in the nodule stage; it would not be wrong to say that the number of mitoses might be high in advanced lesions.


Conclusion

In this study, the clinical-histopathological features of patients with KS were examined. The most common histopathological features belong tumor were extravasated erythrocytes, spindle cell changes, fascicle formation, slit-like space; the most common epidermal features were hyperkeratosis and acanthosis; the most common peritumoral features were the presence of large vessels and ectatic vessels in the periphery. There was a significant relationship between the promontory sign and the lymphangioma-like area and ulcer. Also there was a significant relationship between nuclear atypia and lymphangioma-like area. Mitosis was found to be high in advanced lesions.

While most of the histopathological features were caracteristic for KS, none of them alone was specific. They should be evaluated together with all structural, tumoral and peritumoral features during the diagnostic approach. In addition, it should not be forgotten that the diagnosis could be missed, especially in punch biopsies; and small biopsies should be examined carefully.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Non-invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee of University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Training and Research Hospital (decision no: 2019/3/4) and performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent: Since it was a retrospective study, patient consent was not obtained.

Peer-review: Externally peer reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: C.B.I., Concept: C.B.I., H.Ö.U., Design: C.B.I., Data Collection or Processing: C.B.I., Analysis or Interpretation: C.B.I., H.Ö.U., Literature Search: C.B.I., Writing: C.B.I.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.


  1. Elder DE, Massi D, Scolyer RA, Willemze R. WHO classification of skin tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2018.
  2. Grayson W, Pantanowitz L. Histological variants of cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma. Diagn Pathol 2008;3:31.
  3. Polat AK, Karaali MG, Aksu AEK, Leblebici C, Gürel MS. Evaluation of clinical course, histopathological and treatment characteristics of patients with Kaposi's sarcoma. Turkish Archives of Dermatology & Venerology/Turkderm 2018;52:131-6.
  4. Demirel BG, Koca R, Tekin NS, Kandemir NO, Gün BD, Köktürk F. Classic Kaposi’s sarcoma: The clinical, demographic and teratment characteristics of seventy-four patients. Turkish Archives of Dermatology & Venerology/Turkderm 2016;50:136-40.
  5. Kandemir NO, Gün BD, Barut F, Yurdakan G, Bahadır B, Bektaş S, et al. Histological Subgroups in Classic Kaposi Sarcoma: A Preliminary Study. Archives of the Turkish Dermatology & Venerology/Turkderm 2010;44:73-8.
  6. Salman A, Ozgen Z. Demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics of patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma: A single-center study. Marmara Medical Journal 2019; 32.2: 86-9.
  7. Özkoca D, Aşkın Ö, Serdaroğlu S. Kaposi’s Sarcoma. Dermatoz 2019;10:103-6.
  8. Cesarman E, Damania B, Krown SE, Martin J, Bower M, Whitby D. Kaposi Sarcoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:9.
  9. Bayramoglu Z, Unlu Y. Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of The Patients with Kaposi Sarcoma: A Single Center Study. Selcuk Medical Journal 2020;36:96-100.
  10. Errihani H, Berrada N, Raissouni S, Rais F, Mrabti H, Rais G. Classic Kaposi's sarcoma in Morocco: clinico-epidemiological study at the National Institute of Oncology. BMC dermatology 2011;11:15.
  11. Wu XJ, Pu XM, Kang XJ, Halifu Y, An CX, Zhang DZ, et al. One hundred and five Kaposi sarcoma patients: a clinical study in Xinjiang, Northwest of China. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV 2014;28:1545-52.
  12. Lazova R, McNiff JM, Glusac EJ, Godic A. Promontory sign--present in patch and plaque stage of angiosarcoma! Am J Dermatopathol 2009;31:132-6.
  13. Fernandez-Flores A, Rodriguez R. Promontory sign in a reactive benign vascular proliferation. Am J Dermatopathol 2010;32:700-3.